A Great Place For News, But Not Your Blood Pressure.



Pages

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Judge compares Mandate in Obama Care to Reasons for American Revolution


Finally a Federal Judge who seems to understand some of the reasons for the American Revolution and how it pertains to the Outcry over Obama Care.

According to an Article on World Net Daily (WND), the Judge in the Ruling against Obama Care basically asked, "Why would the Founders of this Great Nation who started a Revolution partially over a Mandate giving the East India Trading Company a monopoly on Tea ....Support a Government Mandate forcing people to buy Health Care?" Here is apart of that Article:

"The federal judge who today ruled that Obamacare is unconstitutional said he couldn't imagine that the Founders of America would have rebelled over a tea tax only to set up a government requiring people to buy tea.

"If it [Congress] has the power to compel an otherwise passive individual into a commercial transaction with a third party merely by asserting – as was done in the Act – that compelling the actual transaction is itself 'commercial and economic in nature and substantially affects interstate commerce,' it is not hyperbolizing to suggest that Congress could do almost anything it wanted," wrote Judge Roger Vinson in his decision declaring the more than 2,000 pages of legislation unconstitutional.

"It is difficult to imagine that a nation which began, at least in part, as the result of opposition to a British mandate giving the East India Company a monopoly and imposing a nominal tax on all tea sold in America would have set out to create a government with the power to force people to buy tea in the first place," he said.

A multitude of organizations whose leaders have been fighting the nationalization under Obama of one-sixth of the nation's economy – the health care complex – agreed.

"We … feel vindicated by Judge Vinson's ruling that the Obamacare mandate – which forces Americans to buy health insurance – is unconstitutional," said a statement from Concerned Women for America.

"We urge Congress to go forward with repealing the law and all its unsavory elements: the unconstitutional mandate, the higher taxes, and the abortion coverage which almost killed the bill in Congress last year."

Vinson concluded that the requirement that all Americans buy the health insurance specified by the government isn't within Congress' power, and since that is instrumental to the rest of the law, the entire package must collapse.

His is the fourth district court opinion on the subject. Two found the plan constitutional and now two have declared it unconstitutional. The status ultimately is expected to be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Florida case, in the U.S. District court in Pensacola, was the most high-profile, however, because it was brought by 26 states and others.

"Congress must operate within the bounds established by the Constitution. … I must reluctantly conclude that Congress exceeded the bounds of its authority in passing the Act with the individual mandate … Because the individual mandate is unconstitutional and not severable, the entire Act must be declared void," he said."



Read more: Judge compares Obamacare to reason for Revolution http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=258221#ixzz1Cjeyt7O9

.

1 comment:

H.C. said...

This Judge is fearless. Compared to other wimp judges, he will not fold over probable threats or bribes.
I am impressed.