Sorry Gibbs, but reaching a conclusion, ie. The President was born her, absent the required evidence, is in itself irrational.
What will be their next argument? He was born here, so that proves he was born here? Perhaps there is a real reason all these lawyers work in POLITICS and not LAW, seeing the conclusions they draw.
2 comments:
Whisky Tango Foxtrot?????
I guess we're living in lala land now? Relativismville?
Seriously, this kind of blather sounds like it came out of circle-time at kindergarten.
Sorry Gibbs, but reaching a conclusion, ie. The President was born her, absent the required evidence, is in itself irrational.
What will be their next argument? He was born here, so that proves he was born here? Perhaps there is a real reason all these lawyers work in POLITICS and not LAW, seeing the conclusions they draw.
Post a Comment